TopTire Review

    Dayton DW 510 Evo vs Rotalla RU01 S Pace

    2026 test data · 8 independent tests

    → See full Dayton vs Rotalla brand comparison

    Dayton DW 510 Evo vs Rotalla RU01 S Pace: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Dayton DW 510 Evo and Rotalla RU01 S Pace appear in 8 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Dayton DW 510 Evo performs. It takes the win in snow. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.

    How the Rotalla RU01 S Pace performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 87/100, based on 7 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Dayton DW 510 Evo and Rotalla RU01 S Pace are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.

    Which one should you buy?

    Choose Dayton DW 510 Evo if

    • You prioritise snow

    Choose Rotalla RU01 S Pace if

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise noise / comfort

    Test profile

    MetricDayton DW 510 EvoRotalla RU01 S Pace
    SegmentTouringTouring
    TypeSummerSummer
    Tests used17
    Best rank#16#1
    Avg rank23.816.0
    Latest test20192023
    Tire Lab Score—87.2

    Tire Lab Score

    No score yet
    87.2
    Very Good · Summer

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryDayton DW 510 EvoRotalla RU01 S PaceWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 20.0
    Avg rank 17.2
    11
    Rotalla RU01 S Pace
    ☀️DryNo data
    Avg rank 17.5
    1
    Rotalla RU01 S Pace
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 29.0
    		No data
    Dayton DW 510 Evo
    🔇Noise / ComfortNo data
    Avg rank 9.2
    1
    Rotalla RU01 S Pace
    📏MileageNo data
    Avg rank 10.0
    Rotalla RU01 S Pace
    🔋EfficiencyNo data
    Avg rank 2.5
    11
    Rotalla RU01 S Pace

    💧 Wet: Dayton DW 510 Evo vs Rotalla RU01 S Pace

    The Rotalla RU01 S Pace wins this category with an average rank of 17.2, compared to 20.0 for the Dayton DW 510 Evo.

    ☀️ Dry: Dayton DW 510 Evo vs Rotalla RU01 S Pace

    The Rotalla RU01 S Pace wins this category with an average rank of 17.5, compared to no data for the Dayton DW 510 Evo.

    ❄️ Snow: Dayton DW 510 Evo vs Rotalla RU01 S Pace

    The Dayton DW 510 Evo wins this category with an average rank of 29.0, compared to no data for the Rotalla RU01 S Pace.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Dayton DW 510 Evo vs Rotalla RU01 S Pace

    The Rotalla RU01 S Pace wins this category with an average rank of 9.2, compared to no data for the Dayton DW 510 Evo.

    📏 Mileage: Dayton DW 510 Evo vs Rotalla RU01 S Pace

    The Rotalla RU01 S Pace wins this category with an average rank of 10.0, compared to no data for the Dayton DW 510 Evo.

    🔋 Efficiency: Dayton DW 510 Evo vs Rotalla RU01 S Pace

    The Rotalla RU01 S Pace wins this category with an average rank of 2.5, compared to no data for the Dayton DW 510 Evo.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Dayton DW 510 Evo or Rotalla RU01 S Pace?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Rotalla RU01 S Pace ranks higher on average than the Dayton DW 510 Evo.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Rotalla RU01 S Pace averages a better dry-braking rank than the Dayton DW 510 Evo across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Rotalla RU01 S Pace ranks better than the Dayton DW 510 Evo.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Rotalla RU01 S Pace shows better mileage performance than the Dayton DW 510 Evo.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Dayton DW 510 Evo appears in 1 independent tests, Rotalla RU01 S Pace in 7.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →