Cooper RS3 RS vs Falken Azenis FK520: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Cooper RS3 RS and Falken Azenis FK520 appear in 16 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Cooper RS3 RS performs. It takes the win in dry. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
How the Falken Azenis FK520 performs. It takes the win in wet, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 89/100, based on 15 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Cooper RS3 RS and Falken Azenis FK520 are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise mileage
Test profile
| Metric | Cooper RS3 RS | Falken Azenis FK520 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | UHP | UHP |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 1 | 15 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 4.5 | 6.6 |
| Latest test | 2021 | 2026 |
| Tire Lab Score | — | 88.5 |
Tire Lab Score
Cooper RS3 RS
Falken Azenis FK520
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Cooper RS3 RS | Falken Azenis FK520 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | No data | Avg rank 6.9 424 | Falken Azenis FK520 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 1.0 1 | Avg rank 6.0 452 | Cooper RS3 RS |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | No data | Avg rank 6.3 34 | Falken Azenis FK520 |
| 📏Mileage | No data | Avg rank 8.6 | Falken Azenis FK520 |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 6.1 3 | Falken Azenis FK520 |
💧 Wet: Cooper RS3 RS vs Falken Azenis FK520
The Falken Azenis FK520 wins this category with an average rank of 6.9, compared to no data for the Cooper RS3 RS.
☀️ Dry: Cooper RS3 RS vs Falken Azenis FK520
The Cooper RS3 RS wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to 6.0 for the Falken Azenis FK520.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Cooper RS3 RS vs Falken Azenis FK520
The Falken Azenis FK520 wins this category with an average rank of 6.3, compared to no data for the Cooper RS3 RS.
📏 Mileage: Cooper RS3 RS vs Falken Azenis FK520
The Falken Azenis FK520 wins this category with an average rank of 8.6, compared to no data for the Cooper RS3 RS.
🔋 Efficiency: Cooper RS3 RS vs Falken Azenis FK520
The Falken Azenis FK520 wins this category with an average rank of 6.1, compared to no data for the Cooper RS3 RS.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Cooper RS3 RS or Falken Azenis FK520?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 ranks higher on average than the Cooper RS3 RS.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Cooper RS3 RS averages a better dry-braking rank than the Falken Azenis FK520 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Falken Azenis FK520 ranks better than the Cooper RS3 RS.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Falken Azenis FK520 shows better mileage performance than the Cooper RS3 RS.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Cooper RS3 RS appears in 1 independent tests, Falken Azenis FK520 in 15.
Also compare
Cooper RS3 RS vs…
Falken Azenis FK520 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →