Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental AllSeasonContact and Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 appear in 51 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Continental AllSeasonContact performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 29 tests.
How the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 95/100, based on 22 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in overall performance and Tire Lab Score. The Continental AllSeasonContact still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Choose Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 if
- You prefer the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2's brand, sizing or price
Test profile
| Metric | Continental AllSeasonContact | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | All Season | Summer |
| Tests used | 29 | 22 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 5.4 | 7.9 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2026 |
| Tire Lab Score | 89.6 | 95.1 |
Tire Lab Score
Continental AllSeasonContact
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Continental AllSeasonContact | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 5.1 6109 | Avg rank 7.3 164 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 7.1 152 | Avg rank 7.7 21 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.2 14169 | No data | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 1.3 21 | No data | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 5.8 267 | Avg rank 7.2 636 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 6.7 1 | Avg rank 8.5 52 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 8.6 1 | Avg rank 10.6 1 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
💧 Wet: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 7.3 for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
☀️ Dry: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 7.1, compared to 7.7 for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
❄️ Snow: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to no data for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
🧊 Ice: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 1.3, compared to no data for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.8, compared to 7.2 for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
📏 Mileage: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 6.7, compared to 8.5 for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
🔋 Efficiency: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 8.6, compared to 10.6 for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Continental AllSeasonContact or Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks higher on average than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Continental AllSeasonContact averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks better than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental AllSeasonContact shows better mileage performance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Continental AllSeasonContact appears in 29 independent tests, Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 in 22.
Also compare
Continental AllSeasonContact vs…
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →