Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M

    2026 test data · 20 independent tests

    → See full Continental vs Mastersteel brand comparison

    Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M appear in 20 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 19 tests.

    How the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M performs. It takes the win in efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 87/100, based on 1 test.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M still wins on efficiency, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow
    • You prioritise efficiency

    Test profile

    MetricContinental AllSeasonContact 2Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M
    SegmentTouringTouring
    TypeAll SeasonAll Season
    Tests used191
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank5.25.3
    Latest test20262018
    Tire Lab Score91.287.4

    Tire Lab Score

    91.2
    Excellent · All Season
    87.4
    Very Good · All Season

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryContinental AllSeasonContact 2Mastersteel ALL WEATHER MWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 4.8
    101010
    Avg rank 6.0
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 5.7
    293
    Avg rank 7.0
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 4.6
    159
    Avg rank 5.0
    1
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    🧊Ice
    Avg rank 5.7
    11
    No data
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 4.4
    3105
    Avg rank 4.5
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 5.0
    12
    No data
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 8.2
    1
    Avg rank 3.0
    1
    Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M

    💧 Wet: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.8, compared to 6.0 for the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M.

    ☀️ Dry: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to 7.0 for the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M.

    ❄️ Snow: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.6, compared to 5.0 for the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M.

    🧊 Ice: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to no data for the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.4, compared to 4.5 for the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M.

    📏 Mileage: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to no data for the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M.

    🔋 Efficiency: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M

    The Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to 8.2 for the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 ranks higher on average than the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 ranks better than the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 shows better mileage performance than the Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Continental AllSeasonContact 2 appears in 19 independent tests, Mastersteel ALL WEATHER M in 1.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →