BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 and Continental WinterContact TS 870 appear in 30 tests, 5 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 performs. It takes the win in snow, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 92/100, based on 18 tests.
How the Continental WinterContact TS 870 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, ice, noise / comfort, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 92/100, based on 12 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 still wins on snow, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise efficiency
Choose Continental WinterContact TS 870 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise ice
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Winter | Touring Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 18 | 12 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 9.2 | 5.0 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 91.5 | 91.6 |
Tire Lab Score
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 9.8 3 | Avg rank 4.5 137 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 12.8 | Avg rank 4.1 45 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.9 9102 | Avg rank 4.0 647 | BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 12.0 | Avg rank 3.9 4 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 9.1 22 | Avg rank 6.1 23 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 9.6 1 | Avg rank 6.0 1 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 8.1 1 | Avg rank 8.7 | BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 5 independent tests:
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 9.8 for the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 4.1, compared to 12.8 for the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2.
❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
The BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 wins this category with an average rank of 3.9, compared to 4.0 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
🧊 Ice: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 3.9, compared to 12.0 for the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 6.1, compared to 9.1 for the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2.
📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to 9.6 for the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
The BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 wins this category with an average rank of 8.1, compared to 8.7 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 or Continental WinterContact TS 870?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 ranks higher on average than the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 averages a better dry-braking rank than the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 ranks better than the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 shows better mileage performance than the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 appears in 18 independent tests, Continental WinterContact TS 870 in 12, with 5 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs…
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →