BFGoodrich Advantage SUV vs BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich Advantage SUV and BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA appear in 3 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich Advantage SUV performs. It takes the win in wet, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 85/100, based on 2 tests.
How the BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA performs. It takes the win in dry. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The BFGoodrich Advantage SUV and BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise efficiency
- You prioritise dry
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich Advantage SUV | BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 2 | 1 |
| Best rank | #1 | #3 |
| Avg rank | 5.0 | 6.6 |
| Latest test | 2021 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 84.7 | — |
Tire Lab Score
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage SUV | BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 4.7 12 | Avg rank 6.8 1 | BFGoodrich Advantage SUV |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 6.0 11 | Avg rank 5.3 | BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 3.2 211 | No data | BFGoodrich Advantage SUV |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 6.5 | No data | BFGoodrich Advantage SUV |
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich Advantage SUV vs BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA
The BFGoodrich Advantage SUV wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 6.8 for the BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich Advantage SUV vs BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA
The BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA wins this category with an average rank of 5.3, compared to 6.0 for the BFGoodrich Advantage SUV.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich Advantage SUV vs BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA
The BFGoodrich Advantage SUV wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to no data for the BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich Advantage SUV vs BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA
The BFGoodrich Advantage SUV wins this category with an average rank of 6.5, compared to no data for the BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich Advantage SUV or BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage SUV ranks higher on average than the BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA averages a better dry-braking rank than the BFGoodrich Advantage SUV across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the BFGoodrich Advantage SUV ranks better than the BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV appears in 2 independent tests, BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA in 1.
Also compare
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV vs…
BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
