Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season and Continental AllSeasonContact 2 appear in 23 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season performs. It takes the win in efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 82/100, based on 4 tests.
How the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 19 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Apollo Alnac 4G All Season still wins on efficiency, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise efficiency
Choose Continental AllSeasonContact 2 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Test profile
| Metric | Apollo Alnac 4G All Season | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 4 | 19 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 13.0 | 5.2 |
| Latest test | 2021 | 2026 |
| Tire Lab Score | 82.4 | 91.2 |
Tire Lab Score
Apollo Alnac 4G All Season
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Apollo Alnac 4G All Season | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 16.8 | Avg rank 4.8 101010 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 14.0 | Avg rank 5.7 293 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 10.0 | Avg rank 4.6 159 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 |
| 🧊Ice | No data | Avg rank 5.7 11 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 9.3 | Avg rank 4.4 3105 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 5.0 12 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 4.0 | Avg rank 8.2 1 | Apollo Alnac 4G All Season |
💧 Wet: Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.8, compared to 16.8 for the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season.
☀️ Dry: Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to 14.0 for the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season.
❄️ Snow: Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.6, compared to 10.0 for the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season.
🧊 Ice: Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to no data for the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.4, compared to 9.3 for the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season.
📏 Mileage: Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to 6.0 for the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season.
🔋 Efficiency: Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Apollo Alnac 4G All Season wins this category with an average rank of 4.0, compared to 8.2 for the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Apollo Alnac 4G All Season or Continental AllSeasonContact 2?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 ranks higher on average than the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 ranks better than the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 shows better mileage performance than the Apollo Alnac 4G All Season.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Apollo Alnac 4G All Season appears in 4 independent tests, Continental AllSeasonContact 2 in 19.
Also compare
Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs…
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
