Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 vs Sava Eskimo Stud: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 and Sava Eskimo Stud appear in 2 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 performs. It takes the win in efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 1 test.
How the Sava Eskimo Stud performs. It takes the win in wet, ice, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 1 test.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Sava Eskimo Stud is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 still wins on efficiency, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise efficiency
Choose Sava Eskimo Stud if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise ice
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Test profile
| Metric | Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 | Sava Eskimo Stud |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Studded Winter | Studded Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 1 | 1 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 4.6 | 3.9 |
| Latest test | 2018 | 2021 |
| Tire Lab Score | 90.4 | 91.3 |
Tire Lab Score
Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62
Sava Eskimo Stud
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 | Sava Eskimo Stud | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 2.0 2 | Sava Eskimo Stud |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Tie |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.3 2 | Avg rank 3.3 2 | Tie |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 4.5 1 | Avg rank 4.0 1 | Sava Eskimo Stud |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | No data | Avg rank 5.0 | Sava Eskimo Stud |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 5.0 | No data | Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 |
💧 Wet: Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 vs Sava Eskimo Stud
The Sava Eskimo Stud wins this category with an average rank of 2.0, compared to 6.0 for the Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62.
☀️ Dry: Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 vs Sava Eskimo Stud
Both tires perform similarly in dry, with average ranks of 3.0 and 3.0.
❄️ Snow: Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 vs Sava Eskimo Stud
Both tires perform similarly in snow, with average ranks of 3.3 and 3.3.
🧊 Ice: Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 vs Sava Eskimo Stud
The Sava Eskimo Stud wins this category with an average rank of 4.0, compared to 4.5 for the Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 vs Sava Eskimo Stud
The Sava Eskimo Stud wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to no data for the Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62.
🔋 Efficiency: Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 vs Sava Eskimo Stud
The Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to no data for the Sava Eskimo Stud.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 or Sava Eskimo Stud?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Sava Eskimo Stud ranks higher on average than the Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Sava Eskimo Stud ranks better than the Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 appears in 1 independent tests, Sava Eskimo Stud in 1.
Also compare
Nexen Winguard winSpike WH62 vs…
Sava Eskimo Stud vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
