Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs Michelin Alpin 7: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Kumho WinterCraft WS71 and Michelin Alpin 7 appear in 6 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Kumho WinterCraft WS71 performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
How the Michelin Alpin 7 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 5 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kumho WinterCraft WS71 and Michelin Alpin 7 are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prefer the Kumho WinterCraft WS71's brand, sizing or price
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Test profile
| Metric | Kumho WinterCraft WS71 | Michelin Alpin 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring Winter | Touring Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 1 | 5 |
| Best rank | #20 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 25.2 | 4.6 |
| Latest test | 2020 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | — | 90.4 |
Tire Lab Score
Kumho WinterCraft WS71
Michelin Alpin 7
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Kumho WinterCraft WS71 | Michelin Alpin 7 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 21.0 | Avg rank 5.5 112 | Michelin Alpin 7 |
| ☀️Dry | No data | Avg rank 4.4 122 | Michelin Alpin 7 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 30.0 | Avg rank 4.5 23 | Michelin Alpin 7 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | No data | Avg rank 4.1 35 | Michelin Alpin 7 |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 8.2 | Michelin Alpin 7 |
💧 Wet: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs Michelin Alpin 7
The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 5.5, compared to 21.0 for the Kumho WinterCraft WS71.
☀️ Dry: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs Michelin Alpin 7
The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 4.4, compared to no data for the Kumho WinterCraft WS71.
❄️ Snow: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs Michelin Alpin 7
The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 30.0 for the Kumho WinterCraft WS71.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs Michelin Alpin 7
The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 4.1, compared to no data for the Kumho WinterCraft WS71.
🔋 Efficiency: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs Michelin Alpin 7
The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 8.2, compared to no data for the Kumho WinterCraft WS71.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Kumho WinterCraft WS71 or Michelin Alpin 7?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Michelin Alpin 7 ranks higher on average than the Kumho WinterCraft WS71.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Michelin Alpin 7 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Kumho WinterCraft WS71 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Michelin Alpin 7 ranks better than the Kumho WinterCraft WS71.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Kumho WinterCraft WS71 appears in 1 independent tests, Michelin Alpin 7 in 5.
Also compare
Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs…
Michelin Alpin 7 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
