Hankook iON Evo vs Michelin Primacy 4: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Hankook iON Evo and Michelin Primacy 4 appear in 28 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Hankook iON Evo performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 95/100, based on 4 tests.
How the Michelin Primacy 4 performs. It takes the win in mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 95/100, based on 24 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Hankook iON Evo is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Michelin Primacy 4 still wins on mileage, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose Hankook iON Evo if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise mileage
Test profile
| Metric | Hankook iON Evo | Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 4 | 24 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 3.1 | 6.0 |
| Latest test | 2026 | 2022 |
| Tire Lab Score | 94.9 | 94.6 |
Tire Lab Score
Hankook iON Evo
Michelin Primacy 4
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Hankook iON Evo | Michelin Primacy 4 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 3.7 343 | Avg rank 5.4 768 | Hankook iON Evo |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 1.9 512 | Avg rank 5.2 755 | Hankook iON Evo |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 3.4 24 | Avg rank 5.7 677 | Hankook iON Evo |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Avg rank 2.7 2 | Michelin Primacy 4 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 4.4 2 | Avg rank 9.6 1 | Hankook iON Evo |
💧 Wet: Hankook iON Evo vs Michelin Primacy 4
The Hankook iON Evo wins this category with an average rank of 3.7, compared to 5.4 for the Michelin Primacy 4.
☀️ Dry: Hankook iON Evo vs Michelin Primacy 4
The Hankook iON Evo wins this category with an average rank of 1.9, compared to 5.2 for the Michelin Primacy 4.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Hankook iON Evo vs Michelin Primacy 4
The Hankook iON Evo wins this category with an average rank of 3.4, compared to 5.7 for the Michelin Primacy 4.
📏 Mileage: Hankook iON Evo vs Michelin Primacy 4
The Michelin Primacy 4 wins this category with an average rank of 2.7, compared to 3.0 for the Hankook iON Evo.
🔋 Efficiency: Hankook iON Evo vs Michelin Primacy 4
The Hankook iON Evo wins this category with an average rank of 4.4, compared to 9.6 for the Michelin Primacy 4.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Hankook iON Evo or Michelin Primacy 4?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Hankook iON Evo ranks higher on average than the Michelin Primacy 4.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Hankook iON Evo averages a better dry-braking rank than the Michelin Primacy 4 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Hankook iON Evo ranks better than the Michelin Primacy 4.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Michelin Primacy 4 shows better mileage performance than the Hankook iON Evo.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Hankook iON Evo appears in 4 independent tests, Michelin Primacy 4 in 24.
Also compare
Hankook iON Evo vs…
Michelin Primacy 4 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →