Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 vs GT-Radial SportActive 2: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 and GT-Radial SportActive 2 appear in 9 tests, 1 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 performs. It takes the win in noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 82/100, based on 2 tests.
How the GT-Radial SportActive 2 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 81/100, based on 7 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in noise / comfort and Tire Lab Score. The GT-Radial SportActive 2 still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 if
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise mileage
Test profile
| Metric | Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 | GT-Radial SportActive 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 2 | 7 |
| Best rank | #2 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 16.1 | 9.2 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 82.3 | 80.8 |
Tire Lab Score
Gislaved Ultra Speed 2
GT-Radial SportActive 2
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 | GT-Radial SportActive 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 14.7 1 | Avg rank 7.4 41 | GT-Radial SportActive 2 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 23.5 | Avg rank 10.8 2 | GT-Radial SportActive 2 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 4.5 1 | Avg rank 7.3 111 | Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 |
| 📏Mileage | No data | Avg rank 11.0 | GT-Radial SportActive 2 |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 7.6 | GT-Radial SportActive 2 |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 1 independent test:
💧 Wet: Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 vs GT-Radial SportActive 2
The GT-Radial SportActive 2 wins this category with an average rank of 7.4, compared to 14.7 for the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2.
☀️ Dry: Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 vs GT-Radial SportActive 2
The GT-Radial SportActive 2 wins this category with an average rank of 10.8, compared to 23.5 for the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 vs GT-Radial SportActive 2
The Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 7.3 for the GT-Radial SportActive 2.
📏 Mileage: Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 vs GT-Radial SportActive 2
The GT-Radial SportActive 2 wins this category with an average rank of 11.0, compared to no data for the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2.
🔋 Efficiency: Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 vs GT-Radial SportActive 2
The GT-Radial SportActive 2 wins this category with an average rank of 7.6, compared to no data for the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 or GT-Radial SportActive 2?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the GT-Radial SportActive 2 ranks higher on average than the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The GT-Radial SportActive 2 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 ranks better than the GT-Radial SportActive 2.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the GT-Radial SportActive 2 shows better mileage performance than the Gislaved Ultra Speed 2.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 appears in 2 independent tests, GT-Radial SportActive 2 in 7, with 1 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
Gislaved Ultra Speed 2 vs…
GT-Radial SportActive 2 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
