Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 appear in 15 tests, 1 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 performs. It takes the win in wet, noise / comfort, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 89/100, based on 4 tests.
How the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performs. It takes the win in dry, snow, ice, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 92/100, based on 11 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in dry and Tire Lab Score. The Falken EUROWINTER HS02 still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise mileage
Choose Kumho Winter Craft WP52 if
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise ice
Test profile
| Metric | Falken EUROWINTER HS02 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Winter | Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 4 | 11 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 9.2 | 10.5 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 88.6 | 91.9 |
Tire Lab Score
Falken EUROWINTER HS02
Kumho Winter Craft WP52
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Falken EUROWINTER HS02 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 8.9 1 | Avg rank 9.1 14 | Falken EUROWINTER HS02 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 4.8 2 | Avg rank 4.7 311 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 13.1 | Avg rank 12.7 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 4.5 1 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 7.4 1 | Avg rank 9.2 112 | Falken EUROWINTER HS02 |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 6.3 | Avg rank 8.7 2 | Falken EUROWINTER HS02 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 6.3 | Avg rank 4.7 1 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 1 independent test:
💧 Wet: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Falken EUROWINTER HS02 wins this category with an average rank of 8.9, compared to 9.1 for the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
☀️ Dry: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 4.8 for the Falken EUROWINTER HS02.
❄️ Snow: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 12.7, compared to 13.1 for the Falken EUROWINTER HS02.
🧊 Ice: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 6.0 for the Falken EUROWINTER HS02.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Falken EUROWINTER HS02 wins this category with an average rank of 7.4, compared to 9.2 for the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
📏 Mileage: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Falken EUROWINTER HS02 wins this category with an average rank of 6.3, compared to 8.7 for the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
🔋 Efficiency: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 6.3 for the Falken EUROWINTER HS02.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Falken EUROWINTER HS02 or Kumho Winter Craft WP52?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 ranks higher on average than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 ranks better than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 shows better mileage performance than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 appears in 4 independent tests, Kumho Winter Craft WP52 in 11, with 1 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs…
Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →