Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 and Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP appear in 13 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Continental WinterContact TS 870 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 92/100, based on 12 tests.
How the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 and Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prefer the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP's brand, sizing or price
Test profile
| Metric | Continental WinterContact TS 870 | Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring Winter | UHP |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 12 | 1 |
| Best rank | #1 | #16 |
| Avg rank | 5.0 | 31.0 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 91.6 | — |
Tire Lab Score
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 | Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 4.5 137 | Avg rank 36.0 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 4.1 45 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 4.0 647 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 3.9 4 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 6.1 23 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 6.0 1 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 8.7 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 |
💧 Wet: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 36.0 for the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
☀️ Dry: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 4.1, compared to no data for the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
❄️ Snow: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 4.0, compared to no data for the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
🧊 Ice: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 3.9, compared to no data for the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 6.1, compared to no data for the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
📏 Mileage: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to no data for the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
🔋 Efficiency: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 wins this category with an average rank of 8.7, compared to no data for the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Continental WinterContact TS 870 or Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 ranks higher on average than the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 ranks better than the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 shows better mileage performance than the Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Continental WinterContact TS 870 appears in 12 independent tests, Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP in 1.
Also compare
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs…
Royal-Black Royal Winter UHP vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
