Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Bridgestone Noranza 001 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 appear in 15 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Bridgestone Noranza 001 performs. It takes the win in wet, snow. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 86/100, based on 4 tests.
How the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performs. It takes the win in dry, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 92/100, based on 11 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in dry and Tire Lab Score. The Bridgestone Noranza 001 still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise snow
Choose Kumho Winter Craft WP52 if
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise ice
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Test profile
| Metric | Bridgestone Noranza 001 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Studded Winter | Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 4 | 11 |
| Best rank | #2 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Latest test | 2021 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 86.1 | 91.9 |
Tire Lab Score
Bridgestone Noranza 001
Kumho Winter Craft WP52
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Bridgestone Noranza 001 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 8.3 2 | Avg rank 9.1 14 | Bridgestone Noranza 001 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 10.3 1 | Avg rank 4.7 311 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 8.8 11 | Avg rank 12.7 | Bridgestone Noranza 001 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 6.7 3 | Avg rank 4.5 1 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 17.5 | Avg rank 9.2 112 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 📏Mileage | No data | Avg rank 8.7 2 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 7.0 | Avg rank 4.7 1 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
💧 Wet: Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Bridgestone Noranza 001 wins this category with an average rank of 8.3, compared to 9.1 for the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
☀️ Dry: Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 10.3 for the Bridgestone Noranza 001.
❄️ Snow: Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Bridgestone Noranza 001 wins this category with an average rank of 8.8, compared to 12.7 for the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
🧊 Ice: Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 6.7 for the Bridgestone Noranza 001.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 9.2, compared to 17.5 for the Bridgestone Noranza 001.
📏 Mileage: Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 8.7, compared to no data for the Bridgestone Noranza 001.
🔋 Efficiency: Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 7.0 for the Bridgestone Noranza 001.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Bridgestone Noranza 001 or Kumho Winter Craft WP52?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Bridgestone Noranza 001 ranks higher on average than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Bridgestone Noranza 001 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 ranks better than the Bridgestone Noranza 001.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 shows better mileage performance than the Bridgestone Noranza 001.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Bridgestone Noranza 001 appears in 4 independent tests, Kumho Winter Craft WP52 in 11.
Also compare
Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs…
Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →