Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs Continental Cross Contact ATR: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 and Continental Cross Contact ATR appear in 1 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Bridgestone Alenza 001 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 82/100, based on 1 test.
How the Continental Cross Contact ATR performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Bridgestone Alenza 001 and Continental Cross Contact ATR are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prefer the Continental Cross Contact ATR's brand, sizing or price
Test profile
| Metric | Bridgestone Alenza 001 | Continental Cross Contact ATR |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | SUV | Summer |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 1 | 0 |
| Best rank | #1 | — |
| Avg rank | 2.8 | — |
| Latest test | — | — |
| Tire Lab Score | 82 | — |
Tire Lab Score
Bridgestone Alenza 001
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza 001 | Continental Cross Contact ATR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 2.6 112 | No data | Bridgestone Alenza 001 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 3.3 1 | No data | Bridgestone Alenza 001 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 3.5 1 | No data | Bridgestone Alenza 001 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 2.0 1 | No data | Bridgestone Alenza 001 |
💧 Wet: Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs Continental Cross Contact ATR
The Bridgestone Alenza 001 wins this category with an average rank of 2.6, compared to no data for the Continental Cross Contact ATR.
☀️ Dry: Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs Continental Cross Contact ATR
The Bridgestone Alenza 001 wins this category with an average rank of 3.3, compared to no data for the Continental Cross Contact ATR.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs Continental Cross Contact ATR
The Bridgestone Alenza 001 wins this category with an average rank of 3.5, compared to no data for the Continental Cross Contact ATR.
🔋 Efficiency: Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs Continental Cross Contact ATR
The Bridgestone Alenza 001 wins this category with an average rank of 2.0, compared to no data for the Continental Cross Contact ATR.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Bridgestone Alenza 001 or Continental Cross Contact ATR?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 ranks higher on average than the Continental Cross Contact ATR.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Bridgestone Alenza 001 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Continental Cross Contact ATR across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 ranks better than the Continental Cross Contact ATR.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Bridgestone Alenza 001 appears in 1 independent tests, Continental Cross Contact ATR in 0.
Also compare
Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs…
Continental Cross Contact ATR vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
