BFGoodrich gGrip vs Michelin Primacy 5: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich gGrip and Michelin Primacy 5 appear in 15 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich gGrip performs. It takes the win in mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 4 tests.
How the Michelin Primacy 5 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 94/100, based on 11 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Michelin Primacy 5 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The BFGoodrich gGrip still wins on mileage, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise mileage
Choose Michelin Primacy 5 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich gGrip | Michelin Primacy 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring, SUV |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 4 | 11 |
| Best rank | #2 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 12.2 | 4.9 |
| Latest test | 2019 | 2026 |
| Tire Lab Score | 90.5 | 94.4 |
Tire Lab Score
BFGoodrich gGrip
Michelin Primacy 5
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich gGrip | Michelin Primacy 5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 13.3 1 | Avg rank 4.6 1104 | Michelin Primacy 5 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 12.3 | Avg rank 5.3 124 | Michelin Primacy 5 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 9.0 | Avg rank 3.7 446 | Michelin Primacy 5 |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Avg rank 9.0 1 | BFGoodrich gGrip |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 11.0 | Avg rank 7.5 | Michelin Primacy 5 |
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich gGrip vs Michelin Primacy 5
The Michelin Primacy 5 wins this category with an average rank of 4.6, compared to 13.3 for the BFGoodrich gGrip.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich gGrip vs Michelin Primacy 5
The Michelin Primacy 5 wins this category with an average rank of 5.3, compared to 12.3 for the BFGoodrich gGrip.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich gGrip vs Michelin Primacy 5
The Michelin Primacy 5 wins this category with an average rank of 3.7, compared to 9.0 for the BFGoodrich gGrip.
📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich gGrip vs Michelin Primacy 5
The BFGoodrich gGrip wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to 9.0 for the Michelin Primacy 5.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich gGrip vs Michelin Primacy 5
The Michelin Primacy 5 wins this category with an average rank of 7.5, compared to 11.0 for the BFGoodrich gGrip.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich gGrip or Michelin Primacy 5?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Michelin Primacy 5 ranks higher on average than the BFGoodrich gGrip.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Michelin Primacy 5 averages a better dry-braking rank than the BFGoodrich gGrip across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Michelin Primacy 5 ranks better than the BFGoodrich gGrip.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the BFGoodrich gGrip shows better mileage performance than the Michelin Primacy 5.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich gGrip appears in 4 independent tests, Michelin Primacy 5 in 11.
Also compare
BFGoodrich gGrip vs…
Michelin Primacy 5 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →