Atlas Force UHP vs Falken Azenis FK510: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Atlas Force UHP and Falken Azenis FK510 appear in 33 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Atlas Force UHP performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 1 test.
How the Falken Azenis FK510 performs. It takes the win in efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 32 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Falken Azenis FK510 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in efficiency and Tire Lab Score. The Atlas Force UHP still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Choose Falken Azenis FK510 if
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | Atlas Force UHP | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | UHP | UHP |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 1 | 32 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 4.4 | 6.1 |
| Latest test | 2023 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 90.1 | 91.1 |
Tire Lab Score
Atlas Force UHP
Falken Azenis FK510
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Atlas Force UHP | Falken Azenis FK510 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 4.7 1 | Avg rank 4.7 51216 | Atlas Force UHP |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 3.3 2 | Avg rank 7.2 43 | Atlas Force UHP |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 3.3 2 | Avg rank 5.9 225 | Atlas Force UHP |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 7.0 | Avg rank 7.3 2 | Atlas Force UHP |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 4.3 145 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
💧 Wet: Atlas Force UHP vs Falken Azenis FK510
The Atlas Force UHP wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 4.7 for the Falken Azenis FK510.
☀️ Dry: Atlas Force UHP vs Falken Azenis FK510
The Atlas Force UHP wins this category with an average rank of 3.3, compared to 7.2 for the Falken Azenis FK510.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Atlas Force UHP vs Falken Azenis FK510
The Atlas Force UHP wins this category with an average rank of 3.3, compared to 5.9 for the Falken Azenis FK510.
📏 Mileage: Atlas Force UHP vs Falken Azenis FK510
The Atlas Force UHP wins this category with an average rank of 7.0, compared to 7.3 for the Falken Azenis FK510.
🔋 Efficiency: Atlas Force UHP vs Falken Azenis FK510
The Falken Azenis FK510 wins this category with an average rank of 4.3, compared to no data for the Atlas Force UHP.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Atlas Force UHP or Falken Azenis FK510?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Atlas Force UHP ranks higher on average than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Atlas Force UHP averages a better dry-braking rank than the Falken Azenis FK510 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Atlas Force UHP ranks better than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Atlas Force UHP shows better mileage performance than the Falken Azenis FK510.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Atlas Force UHP appears in 1 independent tests, Falken Azenis FK510 in 32.
Also compare
Atlas Force UHP vs…
Falken Azenis FK510 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →